Trademark Infringement Detail

Trademark Infringement

In the Matter of the Trade Marks Act and TM Application No. 67288 'BULZAI ENERGY DRINK' in the Name of Kamal Khanbabaei General Trading Co. LLC and Opposition Thereto by Red Bull GmbH [2013]

Parties
Red Bull GmbH v Kamal Khanbabaei General Trading Co. LLC
Court
Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI), Trade Marks Registry
Bench
Registrar Dr. Henry Kibet Mutai
Tags
Trademark opposition Well-known mark
Date
2026-08-26

Facts

Kamal Khanbabaei General Trading applied in January 2010 to register "BULZAI ENERGY DRINK" (word and device, Class 32) with a red/black/white colour restriction. Red Bull GmbH opposed in September 2010, claiming BULZAI was confusingly similar to its RED BULL marks and would take unfair advantage of RED BULL's global and Kenyan reputation, citing unit sales in Kenya rising from 765,792 in 2005 to 4,850,016 in 2010 and marketing spend rising from €124,000 to €849,000 over the same period.

Issues

Whether BULZAI was confusingly similar to RED BULL marks; whether RED BULL marks were well-known in Kenya; whether the marks could coexist under honest concurrent use; and the relevance of prior foreign rulings between the parties.

Rule

Trade Marks Act ss.14, 15(1)-(2), 15A(4); Paris Convention; TRIPS Agreement.

Analysis

The Registrar found BULZAI phonetically, visually and conceptually similar to RED BULL, particularly through shared use of "bull" imagery and the colour red on identical goods. On well-known-mark status, Red Bull's sales and marketing evidence and its 205-jurisdiction registration record were held sufficient to prove notoriety both globally and in Kenya. On coexistence under s.15(2), the applicant provided no evidence of honest concurrent use in Kenya or special circumstances, so could not rely on that provision; foreign rulings from other jurisdictions were held irrelevant to the Kenyan determination.

Conclusion

Registration of BULZAI refused as contrary to ss.14, 15(1) and 15A(4) of the Trade Marks Act; costs awarded to Red Bull GmbH.

Ruling available at kipi.go.ke.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The IP Case Law Database is a repository of case briefs summarising rulings and judgments related to intellectual property law in Kenya. It covers various types of IP, including copyrights, trademarks, patents, and more.

The database is open to legal practitioners, researchers, scholars, and students interested in the field of intellectual property law in Kenya. It is designed to be a useful tool for anyone seeking to understand the legal precedents that shape IP law in the country.

The database features cases across all areas of intellectual property law, including copyright infringement, trademark disputes, patent issues, and cases involving industrial designs and utility models. It also includes cases related to collective management organisations and royalty collection.

We aim to update the database regularly to ensure that it contains the latest rulings and judgments. New cases are added as soon as they are available to keep our users informed about the latest developments in IP law.

Yes, the database is fully searchable. You can search by case name, type of intellectual property, legal issue, or court decision. This allows you to quickly find relevant case briefs based on your research needs.

Each case brief includes key details such as the facts of the case, the legal issues at hand, the court’s ruling, and a summary of the legal analysis. This structure helps users quickly understand the critical points of each ruling.

In addition to the case briefs, we provide links to full-text judgments where available. This ensures that users can access the complete legal reasoning and details if they need more in-depth information.

To cite cases from our database, you should follow standard legal citation practices. Each case brief includes the official case reference, making it easy to include in your legal documents or research papers.

At this time, the database is curated by legal experts and researchers. However, we welcome suggestions for cases to include or features to improve the platform. Please contact us through our support page if you have feedback or suggestions.